Office of the Registrar and Student Awards

20

General University Policies

20.7 University Standards for the Protection of Human Research Participants

    After extensive consultation with each Faculty, General Faculties Council, and the Board of Governors of the University of Alberta have adopted a uniform policy for the ethical treatment of human research participants. This policy applies to all research that involves human participants. The goal of the University Standards for the Protection of Human Research Participants is to ensure that the welfare of human participants is protected and that basic rights are observed. The guidelines included in the University Standards highlight the obligation of researchers: (1) to minimize risk of harm to participants, (2) to obtain informed consent and cooperation from participants, (3) to respect rights of confidentiality and anonymity, and (4) to conduct research competently. The University's view is that the ethical conduct of research is not inherently in conflict with the free pursuit of research goals.

    Each Faculty is charged with the responsibility of reviewing proposed research projects. Ethics Review Committees are not intended to have an adversarial relationship with researchers, but rather to provide consultation and support. The underlying assumption is that people who conduct research with human participants subscribe to ethical research values, but that oversights sometimes occur that can put participants at risk. The purpose of ethics review is to assist in the identification of unintended risk factors and to achieve a resolution that will permit the research to proceed. Experience demonstrates that this approach will result in research that is both productive and ethically acceptable. Questions about research ethics should be directed to the appropriate Faculty Ethics Review Committee.

20.7.1 Precis

    All research using human participants comes under the purview of the University Standards for the Protection of Human Research Participants

(1)

whether participants are drawn from University sources or from any other sources;

(2)

whether participants are paid or unpaid;

(3)

whether it is conducted on University property or at any other location;

(4)

whether it is conducted in a laboratory or in the field;

(5)

whether it is conducted in person or by some other means (e.g., mail, telephone, computer link);

(6)

whether information is collected via direct observation, apparatus, questionnaire, interview, or review of records not normally available to the public;

(7)

when it is conducted for teaching and demonstration purposes where students are either the subjects or the researchers.

    The term researcher(s) in these Standards includes all members of the University, all other persons who advance research as being connected with the University in any way, and all other persons who intend to use University resources in their research (e.g., research space, materials, equipment, student/staff participants, personnel). For the purpose of these Standards, members of the University are all faculty, staff, sessional instructors, administrators, students, visiting or adjunct scholars, fellows and chairs, paid and unpaid research associates and assistants, and any other person in a like position. These Standards apply to all persons who meet the above-stated definition, whether they are principal investigators or junior collaborators.

    Human participation in research includes the direct or indirect involvement of persons who are the focus of a researcher's inquiry, the use of extant documents and other records and materials (e.g., blood and tissue samples) containing information about persons when the collection and the use of such information could deprive them of their dignity or jeopardize their physical or mental wellbeing. Persons studied on the basis of information contained in newspaper and journal articles, or other public materials, are not deemed to be research participants for the purposes of this policy.

20.7.2 Ethical Guidelines

    In those situations where it is difficult to judge the obligation of good scientific enquiry and that of participant protection, formalized rules and regulations cannot be used to resolve the dilemma; instead it is necessary to weigh carefully the values and alternatives. In many cases, decisions reflect a judgement between the expected benefits of the research and the possible effects of the procedures on participants. The purpose of this section is to offer guidelines, rather than definitive rules, to assist in resolving dilemmas.

(1)

If research procedures, material or equipment, or the dissemination of results could potentially produce physical or mental harm for the participant, the investigator must assess the magnitude and present justification for it to an appropriate Ethics Review Committee (ERC). Before approving the research, the committee must be satisfied that there is a reasonable expectation that the results will significantly increase understanding or will benefit human health/welfare. As the magnitude of the potential risk increases, it becomes increasingly important that benefits outweigh those risks.

    Research may be viewed as being ethical when the benefits outweigh the risks and the participants' welfare is safeguarded. In balancing the issues raised by these interrelated considerations, recognition should be given to variations in perceptions regarding ethics from community to community and over time.

    An assessment must be made of the degree of risk, minimal or significant, to a participant. A minimal risk is defined as one that is no greater than the risks of everyday life or of routine medical or psychological examinations. A significant risk involves potential physical or psychological harm to the participants or, in some cases, to the groups of which they are members. If the risk is considered greater than minimal, the investigator must decide whether a participant should be exposed to the procedure. If the procedure is to be undertaken, the investigator must inform the participant of the risk before initiating the study. Should adverse effects result from research procedures, the researcher has an obligation to assist the participant in appreciably reducing or reversing those effects.

    The magnitude of the potential benefit of the proposed research must be appraised by an ERC. The evaluation should be based on a global assessment of the degree to which the research might further our understanding of a phenomenon. Researchers are encouraged to make sure that subjects benefit from participation in the research by such means as educational post-briefing.

(2)

Where possible, participants or their surrogates must give fully informed and voluntary consent to participation.

(3)

Where possible, participants must be guaranteed anonymity and their responses treated with confidentiality. Where exceptions must be made, participants must be informed about the degree of anonymity and confidentiality prior to being asked for consent, and such guarantees must be respected.

    The investigator must establish a fair agreement with the participant which clearly expresses the participant's respective obligations and responsibilities before the participant decides whether or not to participate. Participants should be informed of the opportunity to withdraw at any time without penalty. The researcher must inform the participant of all aspects of the research that could reasonably be expected to influence the participant's willingness to participate. Any incentive offered to participants must not be so large as to become an undue inducement that would undermine the voluntariness of participation. Captive populations, such as prisoners or patients, must not be offered inducements that would unduly improve their situation or influence their relation to others. If the participants are students and are involved in research as part of their education, they must be given an opportunity to obtain equivalent experiences through alternative procedures. In all cases, the participant should be informed of a person who may be contacted in case of concerns, complaints, or consequences. Research with children or participants who have impairments that would limit understanding requires special safeguarding procedures. Normally, consent from these persons must be obtained and these persons must be informed that they are free at any time to withdraw from participation. In addition to assent from a child (if the child has the capacity to understand) consent must be obtained from parents or guardians of the child (under age of 18 years). However, a child's dissent will always override a parent's or guardian's consent, while a child's assent will never override a parent's or guardian's refusal to grant consent. Consent may not be required from participants when the research involves the use of documents, records, pathological or diagnostic specimens, or data already collected (i.e., secondary analysis) or public behavior. “Public” refers to behavior that occurs in a context in which an individual may expect to be observed, recorded or to provide information that may be released. If anonymity and confidentiality cannot be assured, participants must be made aware of this limitation and of the possible consequences before becoming involved. Any use of secondary data not in the public domain must be in compliance with these guidelines.

(4)

Researchers must be competent in their area of inquiry, and they must be familiar with appropriate ethical guidelines and with participant risks and the possible uses to which the results may be put in order to make responsible decisions. The responsibility includes the awareness of and efforts to avoid discrimination and biases in research practices and in the interpretation of findings (for example, biases related to race and gender). When in doubt about the application of these guidelines, the investigator is encouraged to consult with informed colleagues and supervisors.

(5)

The investigator must ensure that all individuals under the investigator's supervision have the training and competence needed to carry out their responsibilities. Principal investigators must ensure that all research personnel are familiar with the University Standards for the Protection of Human Research Participants and with applicable professional guidelines.

    Adequate supervision of student research must be ensured, especially where risk or sensitive areas are present. Because the investigator is ultimately responsible, such supervision is imperative. Researchers will ensure that all research assistants and student investigators are familiar with the University Standards for the Protection of Human Research Participants and with applicable professional guidelines.

(6)

Participants have the following rights: to consent to participate without coercion; to be fully informed about the project, except in special circumstances noted earlier under concealment; to be provided with opportunity to assess risk, including individual risks and individual and societal benefits; to withdraw from the research without penalty or risk of any kind (including loss of agreed-upon monetary reimbursement or other incentives); to be fully informed of the degree of anonymity; to be fully informed during post-briefing when concealment has been used.

Search the Calendar:

Table of Contents

Calendar Home Page
Notices, Errata, Addendum, 2013-2014 PDF Calendar, 2012-2013 Calendar, Previous Calendars, University Policy Gateway

Welcome from the President

Inquiries

Academic Schedule
 11Major Deadlines from the 2013-2014 Academic Schedule
 11.1Academic Schedule 2013-2014 (monthly listing of academic events on campus)

Undergraduate Application Deadlines for Admission and Readmission

Undergraduate Admission
 13 Admission to Undergraduate Programs
 14General Admission Requirements
 15Admission Requirements by Faculty
 16Admission for International Baccalaureate and Advanced Placement Students
 17Admission from Outside Alberta

University Regulations and Information for Students
 20General University Policies
 21Classification of Students
 22Registration and Fees
 23Academic Regulations
 24Student Services
 25Code of Student Behaviour
 26Code of Applicant Behaviour

Programs
30Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences
40Faculty of Arts
50Augustana Faculty
60Faculty of Business
70Faculty of Education
80Faculty of Engineering
90Faculty of Extension
100Faculty of Law
110Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry
120Faculty of Native Studies
130Faculty of Nursing
140Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
150Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation
160School of Public Health
170Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine
180Faculté Saint-Jean
191Faculty of Science

Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research
 200The Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research
 201Members of the Faculty
 202General Information
 203Regulations of the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research
 204Graduate Program Regulations
 205Graduate Programs
 210Graduate Financial Aid

Open Studies

Course Listings
 230Details of Courses
 231Course Listings

Glossary

General Information
 241University History and Traditions
 242Constitution of the University
 243University Libraries
 244Alumni Association
 245Affiliated Colleges

University Staff
 250Continuing Academic Staff
 251Emeriti
 252Associate and Adjunct Staff
 253Honorary Degree Recipients